Archive for September, 2003

It’s Only Just Begun

Tuesday, September 30th, 2003

It’s up as a Flash at Drudge, so it won’t be around long. Full text below. DRUDGE REPORT 2003® XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX TUES SEPT 30, 2003 20:52:37 ET XXXXX ‘SHE HAS BEEN UNDER COVER FOR THREE DECADES’ A former counter-terrorism official at the CIA and the State Department claimed Tuesday night that outted CIA agent “Valerie Plame” was under cover for three decades and was not a “CIA analyst” as columnist Bob Novak has suggested. Larry Johnson made the charge on PBS’s NEWSHOUR. “I worked with this woman. She started training with me. She has been under cover for three decades. She is not as Bob Novak suggested a “CIA analyst.” Given that, i was a CIA analyst for 4 years. I was under cover. I could not divulge to my family outside of my wife that I worked for the CIA unti I left the Intelligence Agency on Sept. 30, 1989. At that point I could admit it. The fact that she was under cover for three decades and that has been divulged is outrageous. She was put undercover for certain reasons. One, she works in an area where people she works with overseas could be compromised… “For these journalists to argue that this is no big deal… and if I hear another Republican operative suggesting that, well, this was just an analyst. Fine. Let them go undercover. Let’s put them go overseas. Let’s out them and see how they like it… “I say this as a registered Republican. I am on record giving contributions to the George Bush campaign. This is not about partisan politics. This is about a betrayal, a political smear, of an individual who had no relevance to the story. Publishing her name in that story added nothing to it because the entire intent was, correctly as Amb. Wilson noted, to intimidate, to suggest taht there was some impropriety that somehow his wife was in a decision-making position to influence his ability to go over and savage a stupid policy, an erroneous policy, and frankly what was a false policy of suggesting that there was nuclear material in Iraq that required this war. This was about a political attack. To pretend it was something else, to get into this parsing of words. “I tell you, it sickens me to be a Republican to see this.”

Sadly, Updated Daily

Tuesday, September 30th, 2003

Calendar of US Military Dead during Iraqi War

Does He Feel This Way About Rove and Condi?

Tuesday, September 30th, 2003

REMARKS BY GEORGE BUSH, 41ST PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, AT THE DEDICATION CEREMONY FOR THE GEORGE BUSH CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE, APRIL 26, 1999 Even though I’m a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious, of traitors.

Welcome Aboard Northrop

Monday, September 29th, 2003

Northrop wins DIMHRS contract The Defense Department today announced that Northrop Grumman Information Technology has won a contract worth $281 million for development and implementation of the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System.

You Know, I Already Have Second Thoughts

Sunday, September 28th, 2003

At first I thought this was pretty cool, but in the end, I think kind of like when the Amazon 100 lists get over-taken by Scientologists pushing ElRon, this is going to end up sucking. But, if I had to pick, I toss the Marshall Plan, Civil Rights Act, Plessy, the 13th Amendment , Bill of Rights, the Declaration, The Fed Papers, Marbury vs Madison, Monroe Doctrine and Dred Scott in my top ten. usnews.com: The People’s Vote: 100 Documents that shaped America

Answer The Question, Chickensh|t

Saturday, September 27th, 2003

The Failure to Find Iraqi Weapons Yesterday, Secretary of State Colin Powell met with Times editors. Asked whether Americans would have supported this war if weapons of mass destruction had not been at issue, Mr. Powell said the question was too hypothetical to answer. Asked if he, personally, would have supported it, he smiled, thrust his hand out and said, “It was good to meet you.” And on that note, care to see where the 87 billion could have gone?

Not That This Is Any Suprise

Thursday, September 25th, 2003

Why are US service members getting killed again? The Iraqi regime . . . possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons. We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, VX nerve gas. George W. Bush, President
Cincinnati, Ohio Speech
10/7/2002
BBC NEWS | UK | Politics | No WMD in Iraq, source claims No weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq by the group looking for them, according to a Bush administration source who has spoken to the BBC. … Mr Neil said the draft report - which the source said is due to be published next month - concludes that it is highly unlikely that weapons of mass destruction were shipped out of the country to places like Syria before the US-led war on Iraq. … Mr Neil said that according to the source, the report will say its inspectors have not even unearthed “minute amounts of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons material”. They have also not uncovered any laboratories involved in deploying weapons of mass destruction and no delivery systems for the weapons. … The inspectors have uncovered no evidence that any weapons were actually built in the immediate years before the war, the leak of the report suggests.

Haven’t Forgotten About You Chimp Boy

Friday, September 19th, 2003

Chimpster - you can still go fsck yourself. Seems I’m not the only one who thinks this way. Oracle FUD has faded, PeopleSoft customers say “We chose PeopleSoft over Oracle two years ago, and we’d do the same thing today,”

Remember Max Cleland?

Thursday, September 18th, 2003

He’s the former senator from Georgia who lost both legs and an arm in Vietnam and was labelled “unpatriotic” by the Rove-directed, and non-serving, Saxby Chambliss. (Side note - I was in Aiken, SC at the time and saw the infamous ad where they morphed Cleland’s head into OBL’s. Really classy.) Anyway, Max has a few interesting things to say. ajc.com | Opinion | Mistakes of Vietnam repeated with Iraq The president of the United States decides to go to war against a nation led by a brutal dictator supported by one-party rule. That dictator has made war on his neighbors. The president decides this is a threat to the United States. In his campaign for president he gives no indication of wanting to go to war. In fact, he decries the overextension of American military might and says other nations must do more. However, unbeknownst to the American public, the president’s own Pentagon advisers have already cooked up a plan to go to war. All they are looking for is an excuse. Based on faulty intelligence, cherry-picked information is fed to Congress and the American people. The president goes on national television to make the case for war, using as part of the rationale an incident that never happened. Congress buys the bait — hook, line and sinker — and passes a resolution giving the president the authority to use “all necessary means” to prosecute the war. The war is started with an air and ground attack. Initially there is optimism. The president says we are winning. The cocky, self-assured secretary of defense says we are winning. As a matter of fact, the secretary of defense promises the troops will be home soon. However, the truth on the ground that the soldiers face in the war is different than the political policy that sent them there. They face increased opposition from a determined enemy. They are surprised by terrorist attacks, village assassinations, increasing casualties and growing anti-American sentiment. They find themselves bogged down in a guerrilla land war, unable to move forward and unable to disengage because there are no allies to turn the war over to. There is no plan B. There is no exit strategy. Military morale declines. The president’s popularity sinks and the American people are increasingly frustrated by the cost of blood and treasure poured into a never-ending war. Sound familiar? It does to me. The president was Lyndon Johnson. The cocky, self-assured secretary of defense was Robert McNamara. The congressional resolution was the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. The war was the war that I, U.S. Sens. John Kerry, Chuck Hagel and John McCain and 3 1/2 million other Americans of our generation were caught up in. It was the scene of America’s longest war. It was also the locale of the most frustrating outcome of any war this nation has ever fought. Unfortunately, the people who drove the engine to get into the war in Iraq never served in Vietnam. Not the president. Not the vice president. Not the secretary of defense. Not the deputy secretary of defense. Too bad. They could have learned some lessons: • Don’t underestimate the enemy. The enemy always has one option you cannot control. He always has the option to die. This is especially true if you are dealing with true believers and guerillas fighting for their version of reality, whether political or religious. They are what Tom Friedman of The New York Times calls the “non-deterrables.” If those non-deterrables are already in their country, they will be able to wait you out until you go home. • If the enemy adopts a “hit-and-run” strategy designed to inflict maximum casualties on you, you may win every battle, but (as Walter Lippman once said about Vietnam) you can’t win the war. • If you adopt a strategy of not just pre-emptive strike but also pre-emptive war, you own the aftermath. You better plan for it. You better have an exit strategy because you cannot stay there indefinitely unless you make it the 51st state. If you do stay an extended period of time, you then become an occupier, not a liberator. That feeds the enemy against you. • If you adopt the strategy of pre-emptive war, your intelligence must be not just “darn good,” as the president has said; it must be “bulletproof,” as Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld claimed the administration’s was against Saddam Hussein. Anything short of that saps credibility. • If you want to know what is really going on in the war, ask the troops on the ground, not the policy-makers in Washington. • In a democracy, instead of truth being the first casualty in war, it should be the first cause of war. It is the only way the Congress and the American people can cope with getting through it. As credibility is strained, support for the war and support for the troops go downhill. Continued loss of credibility drains troop morale, the media become more suspicious, the public becomes more incredulous and Congress is reduced to hearings and investigations. Instead of learning the lessons of Vietnam, where all of the above happened, the president, the vice president, the secretary of defense and the deputy secretary of defense have gotten this country into a disaster in the desert. They attacked a country that had not attacked us. They did so on intelligence that was faulty, misrepresented and highly questionable. A key piece of that intelligence was an outright lie that the White House put into the president’s State of the Union speech. These officials have overextended the American military, including the National Guard and the Reserve, and have expanded the U.S. Army to the breaking point. A quarter of a million troops are committed to the Iraq war theater, most of them bogged down in Baghdad. Morale is declining and casualties continue to increase. In addition to the human cost, the war in dollars costs $1 billion a week, adding to the additional burden of an already depressed economy. The president has declared “major combat over” and sent a message to every terrorist, “Bring them on.” As a result, he has lost more people in his war than his father did in his and there is no end in sight. Military commanders are left with extended tours of duty for servicemen and women who were told long ago they were going home. We are keeping American forces on the ground, where they have become sitting ducks in a shooting gallery for every terrorist in the Middle East. Welcome to Vietnam, Mr. President. Sorry you didn’t go when you had the chance.
–Max Cleland, former U.S. senator, was head of the Veterans Administration in the Carter administration. He teaches at American University in Washington

Amen Brother!

Wednesday, September 17th, 2003

National Review Online (http://www.nationalreview.com) The warning signs are there for all to see. Oracle is trying to drive away competition, to get PeopleSoft’s products off the market, software that many states, cities, school systems, and private businesses rely on and, furthermore, like to operate. In fact, many research firms have been advising clients to steer clear of purchasing enterprise software — just the advice firms need to hear as our economy is heading out of recession. Oracle’s scheme is to force all these businesses, government agencies, and educational institutions to spend countless dollars replacing the PeopleSoft software with Oracle’s. This doesn’t enhance productivity or improve the economy. If Oracle cannot beat PeopleSoft’s product with superior software it shouldn’t be allowed to destroy PeopleSoft.